Pp V Kok Wah Kuan
Kok wah kuan v pp 2007 chloe wong.
Pp v kok wah kuan. After the amendment there is no longer a specific provision declaring that the judicial power of the federation shall be vested in the two high courts. 2 kok wah kuan v pp 2007 4 clj 454. This was the final rites given to the idea of separation of powers and subsequently.
For this part you are required to read the following cases. 2 a significant question of constitutional law arose. Introduction in the recent judgment of the malaysian court of appeal1 in kok wah kuan v.
It was whether the amendment3 to article 121 of the malaysian federal constitution the constitution made on 10. 1 constitution amendment act 1988. 1 the respondent who was.
Section 97 2 of the child act 2001. Kok wah kuan federal court putrajaya criminal appeal no. In case readers of this article are not immediately familiar the case of pp v kok wah kuan 2007 6 clj 341 dealt with a child who was convicted of killing his tuition teacher s daughter.
In both cases what is are the provision s that became the main subject in dispute. The amendment to art. 05 46 2007 w ahmad fairuz cj abdul hamid mohamad pca alauddin mohd sheriff cj malaya richard malanjum cj sabah sarawak zaki tun azmi fcj 23 october 2007 judgment abdul hamid mohamad pca.
The fears of the former lord president manifested itself in the case of pp v kok wah kuan 2008 where the federal court effectively held that the doctrine of separation of powers was not a provision of our federal constitution and any law that violated the doctrine may not be declared unconstitutional. 3 2017 3 mlj 561. Advocate solicitor of the high court of malaya co deputy chairperson of the bar council s constitutional law committee.
Kok wah kuan v. 60 shorter articles and notes 2017. Kong poh ing v public prosecutor duration.
3 from the case of pp v kok wah kuan the court held that malaysia does not practice the doctrine of separation of powers strictly i quote it is common for a statute to make provision for a minister in charge of an act of parliament to make rules or regulations. A kok wah kuan v pp 2007 4 clj 454 b pp v kok wah kuan 2007 6 clj 341. Nuhaunna halim 133 views.
121 1 by act a704 in 1988 followed 20 years later by the federal court case of pp v kok wah kuan 2007 6 clj 341 are disturbing developments as far as the doctrine of.
